1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 899 P.2d
  5. 899 P.2d 434 (1995)
 

HAMILTON v. TED BEAMIS LOGGING & CONST.

No. 21537.

899 P.2d 434 (1995)

127 Idaho 221

Martin Dale HAMILTON, Claimant-Respondent, v. TED BEAMIS LOGGING & CONSTRUCTION, employer, and Associated Loggers Exchange, surety, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Idaho, North Idaho, April 1995 Term.

Rehearing Denied August 16, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moffatt, Thomas, Barrett, Rock & Fields, Chtd., Boise, for appellants. John W. Barrett argued.

James F. Combo, Coeur d'Alene, for respondent.

TROUT, Justice.

I.

BACKGROUND

This is an Industrial Commission case. The respondent, Martin Dale Hamilton (Hamilton), first suffered an industrial injury in October, 1985. He had been working as a sawyer and his left foot was crushed in a logging accident. The injury required amputation of two toes, and a section of the ball of his foot. Hamilton had problems returning to work due to loss of balance, pain, and problems with skin grafts, however...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases