1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 658 A.2d
  5. 658 A.2d 661 (1995)
 

CHASE v. CITY OF PORTLAND

658 A.2d 661 (1995)

Bruce CHASE, et al. v. CITY OF PORTLAND, et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided May 24, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald F. Fontaine (orally), Fontaine & Beal, Portland, for plaintiffs.

Gary C. Wood, Elizabeth L. Boynton (orally), City of Portland, Portland, Polly Haight Frawley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Augusta, for defendants.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA and LIPEZ, JJ.

CLIFFORD, Justice.

The City of Portland is now, and was in 1977, a participating local district in the Maine State Retirement System. See 5 M.R.S.A. § 18201 (1989 & Supp.1994). Pursuant to state law, employees of the City were eligible for one of two separate retirement plans. Police officers and firefighters were eligible for a "special plan" retirement plan (special plan) permitting retirement after twenty years of service with no age qualification...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases