ANDREWS, Judge.
The issue here is when the Uniform Traffic Citation (UTC) charged a violation of "OCGA § 40-6-391" without specifying whether subsection (a)(1) or (a)(4) was meant and the evidence would have supported either subsection, was the superior court's affirmance of the city court's denial of a motion to quash for ambiguity reversible error? We find, on the record before us, that it was not.
No transcript of the proceedings below was produced...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
