HOCKE v. HANYANE

No. 9318SC726.

456 S.E.2d 858 (1995)

118 N.C. App. 630

Carl O. HOCKE, Plaintiff, v. Benedict K. HANYANE, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 2, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gabriel Berry & Weston by M. Douglas Berry, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellee.

Harris & Iorio by Douglas S. Harris, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant.


JOHN, Judge.

Defendant appeals entry of judgment by default. He contends the trial court erred by: (1) rendering judgment following inadequate service of process, (2) basing the judgment upon rumor and speculation, and (3) proceeding to judgment prior to the filing of executed summons. Defendant's assertions are unfounded.

Facts and procedural information pertinent to this appeal are as follows: In February 1988, Benedict Hanyane (defendant) was seriously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases