PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges his sentence as a habitual offender to consecutive five-year terms of incarceration for burglary of a structure, grand theft and possession of burglary tools. The state concedes that all of the above offenses occurred during the same criminal episode. Thus, it is clear that the trial court erred in sentencing appellant to consecutive terms of incarceration. See Hale v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.