RAYBESTOS PRODUCTS CO. v. YOUNGER

Nos. 94-2267, 94-2321.

54 F.3d 1234 (1995)

RAYBESTOS PRODUCTS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Gilbert W. YOUNGER, an individual, and TransGo, a California corporation, Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided April 6, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald E. Knebel, Barnes & Thornburg, Indianapolis, IN, Jeffrey D. Lewin, Candace M. Carroll (argued), Sullivan, Hill, Lewin & Markahm, San Diego, CA, Legrande L. Young, Shelton, CT, for Raybestos Products Co., a Delaware corp.

John R. Schaibley, III, Scott D. Himsel, Baker & Daniels, Indianapolis, IN, Lois D. Thompson (argued), David S. Lippman, Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, Los Angeles, CA, for Gilbert W. Younger, an individual, Transgo, a Cal. corp.

Before BRIGHT, BAUER and COFFEY, Circuit Judges.


BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.

I. Introduction

In this defamation action, Raybestos Products Company (Raybestos) brought suit against Gilbert W. Younger and TransGo, Inc. (TransGo), seeking damages for injuries suffered as a result of allegedly defamatory statements made about certain Raybestos products. Raybestos specifically alleged causes of action under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B), the Indiana RICO statute, Ind.Code Ann. § 35-45-6-1 ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases