1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 901 S.W.2d
  5. 901 S.W.2d 382 (1995)
 

INDUST. DEV. BD. OF TULLAHOMA v. HANCOCK

901 S.W.2d 382 (1995)

The INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF the CITY OF TULLAHOMA, Tennessee, the City of Tullahoma, Tennessee and the Board of Public Utilities of the City of Tullahoma, Tennessee, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. C.N. HANCOCK, Defendant/Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville.

Permission to Appeal Denied May 30, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Van Cleave, Tullahoma, for plaintiff/appellee Indus. Development Bd. of the City of Tullahoma, Tennessee.

Stephen M. Worsham, Tullahoma, for plaintiff/appellee City of Tullahoma, Tennessee.

William C. Rieder, Tullahoma, for plaintiff/appellee Bd. of Public Utilities of Tullahoma, Tennessee.

C.N. Hancock, pro se.

Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court May 30, 1995.

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

The Chancery Court of Coffee County granted summary judgment to the City of Tullahoma, its Industrial Development Board, and its Board of Public Utilities declaring void the appellant's "allodium title" laying claim to the Tullahoma Industrial Park. In addition the court enjoined the appellant from asserting any further claim to the property and assessed fees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases