1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 51 F.3d
  5. 51 F.3d 1229 (1995)
 

CHESAPEAKE PAPER PRODUCTS CO. v. S&W ENGINEERING

No. 94-1617.

51 F.3d 1229 (1995)

CHESAPEAKE PAPER PRODUCTS COMPANY, Successor in Interest to Chesapeake Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIDEWATER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Third Party Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided April 19, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Robert Joseph Kaler, Jr., Gadsby & Hannah, Boston, MA, for appellant. Edward Joseph Fuhr, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, VA, for appellee. ON BRIEF: James E. Farnham, Donald P. Boyle, Jr., Hunton & Williams, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before RUSSELL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CURRIE, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge RUSSELL wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge CURRIE joined.

OPINION

DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:

Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. (S & W) appeals from the district court's denial of S & W's motion for partial summary judgment and motion for a new trial. We decline to review the district court's order denying S & W's summary judgment motion, and we affirm the district court's order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases