OTEC v. BURLINGTON R.R.

No. 64605.

890 S.W.2d 387 (1995)

Charles R. OTEC, III, et ux., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD, et al., Defendants/Respondents.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

January 3, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Richard McEachern, St. Louis, for appellants.

William A. Brasher, Timothy D. Richardson, St. Louis, for respondents.

Before GRIMM, C.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and CRANE, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-driver and his wife sued railroad for personal injuries sustained in a collision with a train at a railroad crossing. A jury found driver 100% negligent. Plaintiffs appeal.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases