TESTA v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY

95-008; CA A89389.

903 P.2d 373 (1995)

137 Or. App. 21

Paul D. TESTA, Sharon C. Testa, Jack A. Thorsen and B. Elaine Thorsen, Respondents, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY, Respondent, and Samuel Hale and Leslie Hale, Petitioners, and Don Mouser and Betty Mouser, Intervenors-Respondents Below.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided: September 27, 1995.

Review Denied December 19, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Shonkwiler, Tigard, filed the brief for petitioners.

Paul D. Testa and Sharon C. Testa filed the brief pro se.

No appearance by respondents Jack A. Thorsen, B. Elaine Thorsen and Clackamas County.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners1 Hale seek review of LUBA's reversal of a declaratory ruling that petitioners obtained from Clackamas County. We affirm.

Petitioners requested a declaratory interpretation from the county, under section 1305.01(K) of its zoning ordinance, ostensibly regarding the meaning of county legislation pertaining to its Transitional Timber District (TTD) zone. At the time of the request, petitioners and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases