Judgment modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff met his burden of proving, with evidence of convincing clarity, that defendant made false statements concerning him "with `actual malice' — that is, knowing they were false or subjectively entertaining serious doubt as to their truth" (Mahoney v Adirondack Publ. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PROZERALIK v. CAPITAL CITIES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
222 A.D.2d 1020 (1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 913
John Prozeralik, Respondent, v. Capital Cities Communications, Inc., Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 22, 1995
December 22, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
