Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
The sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant upon his conviction for violation of probation without requiring an updated presentence investigation report. Defendant did not request that the initial report prepared some six months before be updated, and the court was fully familiar with changes in defendant's status since the preparation of that report (see, People v Schalk
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
