Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum:
Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion to dismiss at the close of proof. Contrary to defendant's contention, expert testimony was not required to establish a prima facie case because this case involves ordinary negligence, not medical malpractice (see, Kerker v Hurwitz,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.