Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant argues for the first time on appeal that suppression of his statement to the police is required because it was obtained in violation of his right to counsel. He argues that there was a three-week delay between the decision to arrest defendant and the date of his warrantless arrest and that "the only conceivable reason" for the decision not to obtain an arrest warrant was to deprive defendant of his right...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
