1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 529 N.W.2d
  5. 529 N.W.2d 690 (1995)
 

NAT. HYDRO SYSTEMS v. M.A. MORTENSON

No. C1-93-752.

529 N.W.2d 690 (1995)

NATIONAL HYDRO SYSTEMS, a division of McNISH CORPORATION, Respondent, v. M.A. MORTENSON COMPANY, et al., Defendants, HDR Engineering, Inc., petitioner, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 14, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rebecca Egge Moos, Bassford, Heckt, Lockhart, Truesdell & Briggs, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Thomsen & Nybeck, P.A., Mark G. Ohnstad, Edina, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

Appellant, HDR Engineering, Inc. ("HDR"), seeks review of a court of appeals' decision reversing the trial court's summary judgment of a claim brought by Respondent, National Hydro Systems ("National Hydro"). The principal issue raised on this appeal is whether the general contractor, M.A. Mortenson Company ("Mortenson"), is obligated under the general construction contract to indemnify...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases