1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 214 A.D.2d
  5. 214 A.D.2d 1005 (1995)
 

FOLEY v. MOBIL CHEM. CO.

214 A.D.2d 1005 (1995)

626 N.Y.S.2d 908

Ramona L. Foley, Respondent, v. Mobil Chemical Company et al., Defendants, and Steve Barnett, Appellant.(Appeal No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

April 28, 1995

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant Steve Barnett contends that he was entitled to summary judgment on the ground that he is not an "employer" within the meaning of the Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 296). Barnett, as a corporate employee, is not subject to a discrimination suit under the Human Rights Law unless it is shown...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases