1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 908 P.2d
  5. 908 P.2d 300 (1995)
 

GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER v. TUALATIN TIRE & AUTO

CC C89-0099CV; CA A73536; SC S41806.

908 P.2d 300 (1995)

322 Or. 406

The GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, Respondent on Review, v. TUALATIN TIRE & AUTO, INC., an Oregon corporation, Petitioner on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided December 29, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark E. Griffin, of Griffin & McCandlish, Portland, and Kim E. Hoyt, of Ferder, Brandt & Casebeer, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. Mark E. Griffin filed the petition.

William H. Walters, of Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief was Linda L. Marshall.

Gary M. Berne and David C. Rees, of Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter P.C., Portland, filed a brief for amicus curiae Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.

GILLETTE, Justice.

This is a civil case involving a number of disputes between a franchisor, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Goodyear), and a franchisee, Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc. (Tualatin). We allowed review to determine two important issues of civil procedure. The first is whether the "we can't tell" rule, described by this court in Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital, 309 Or. 350

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases