1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 221 A.D.2d
  5. 221 A.D.2d 986 (1995)
 

HARTFORD v. BLACK & DECKER U.S. INC.

221 A.D.2d 986 (1995)

634 N.Y.S.2d 294

The Hartford, as Subrogee for Ernest Jackson and Another, et al., Respondents, v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Macco Adhesives et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents Connie J. Foster, Individually and as Administratrix of The Estate of Carla Ann Peelman, Deceased, Respondent, v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., Appellant, and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation et al., Respondents Kathy Jackson, Individually and as Administratrix of The Estates of Shannon B. Murray and Another, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., Appellant, and Edward Colburn et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

November 15, 1995

Order unanimously modified on the law and in the exercise of discretion and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: This consolidated action arises out of a fire that occurred on September 23, 1989, in which three children perished. Plaintiffs allege that the fire resulted from a defective coffeemaker manufactured by defendant and third-party plaintiff, Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc. (Black & Decker). Black & Decker appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases