1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 906 P.2d
  5. 906 P.2d 295 (1995)
 

McCALL v. DYNIC USA CORP.

C93-0334CV; CA A84907.

906 P.2d 295 (1995)

138 Or. App. 1

Kathy McCALL, Appellant, v. DYNIC USA CORPORATION and Kathy Hogan, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 22, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin L. Cathcart, Beaverton, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Clayton H. Morrison.

Scott G. Seidman, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Zachary W.L. Wright and Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke & Booth.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.

WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment for defendants1 in this employment discrimination case. She argues that the trial court erred in applying issue preclusion to the reason for her discharge from employment. We affirm.

Defendants are entitled to summary judgment if they have shown that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ORCP 47 C.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases