STATE v. BAKER

Nos. 94 TRC 1255, 94 TRC 17025, 94 TRC 17801, 94 TRC 18631, 94 TRC 20611, 94 TRC 20905, 94 TRC 20931, 94 TRC 21090, 95 TRC 105, 95 TRC 371, 95 TRC 421, 95 TRC 725, 95 TRC 921 and 95 TRC 1505.

70 Ohio Misc.2d 49 (1995)

The STATE of Ohio v. BAKER et al.

Clark County Municipal Court, Ohio.

Decided February 24, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Denise L. Gretz, Springfield Assistant Municipal Prosecutor, for plaintiff.

Anthony Zaharieff, for defendant.


RICHARD P. CAREY, Judge.

A number of defendants1 have challenged the constitutionality of R.C. 4511.19, 4511.191, and related statutes born of S.B. No. 62 (1993, 120th General Assembly) and referred to loosely but commonly as the "new D.U.I. law." Although the facts vary among the cases—and accordingly the nature of a particular constitutional challenge—collectively the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases