Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant contends that his statement and physical evidence should have been suppressed because they were the product of an involuntary and unlawful detention without probable cause and because his consent to search was not voluntarily obtained. We disagree. Defendant was not in custody when he made an inculpatory statement and signed a consent to search form (see, People v Yukl,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
