1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 907 P.2d
  5. 907 P.2d 282 (1995)
 

REESE v. STROH

No. 61935-2.

907 P.2d 282 (1995)

128 Wash.2d 300

William Foster REESE and Frances Reese, Respondents, v. James E. STROH, Jr., M.D., and Mary Jo Stroh, Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 14, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwards, Sieh, Wiggins & Hathaway, Malcolm Edwards, Seattle, Bryan Harnetiaux, Harbaugh & Bloom, Gary N. Bloom, Spokane, Thorsrud, Cane & Paulich, Russell C. Love, Lane, Powell, Spears & Lubersky, Linda B. Clapham, Seattle, for Amicus Curiae.

Williams, Kastner & Gibbs, Mary H. Spillane, Seattle, for Petitioners.

Richards & Kinerk, Dwayne A. Richards, Maltman, Reed, North, Ahrens & Malnati, Douglass A. North, Seattle, for Respondents.

MADSEN, Justice.

William and Frances Reese brought this medical malpractice action against Dr. James E. Stroh, Jr., alleging that he negligently failed to treat Mr. Reese's emphysema with a protein replacement therapy called Prolastin. The trial court excluded the Reeses' expert medical witness' opinion testimony regarding causation as lacking sufficient foundation to go to the jury. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding such testimony should be evaluated under the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases