Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
On appeal from a judgment convicting him of one count each of criminal sale and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, defendant contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence because an investigator who identified defendant failed to note the existence of defendant's facial scar. The only proof that defendant had that scar on the date of the transaction was the testimony...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
