CITY OF SANTA CRUZ v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. H014128.

40 Cal.App.4th 1146 (1995)

48 Cal. Rptr.2d 216

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, Respondent; BOMBAY CORPORATION, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

December 6, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Atchison, Anderson, Hurley & Barisone, John G. Barisone and Anthony P. Condotti for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Baker & McKenzie, Timothy A. Tosta, Bruce H. Jackson and Timothy D. Cremin for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

COTTLE, P.J.

In this action challenging the City of Santa Cruz's (City's) adoption of a general plan, the trial court ordered City's planning director and commissioners to reveal in depositions "whether there was an agreement among the council and commission members to refuse to consider any zoning for the greenbelt properties other than agricultural, regardless of the facts or evidence presented."

We stayed the depositions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases