CALIF. GILLNETTERS ASSN. v. DEPT. OF FISH & GAME

Docket No. D021547.

39 Cal.App.4th 1145 (1995)

46 Cal. Rptr.2d 338

CALIFORNIA GILLNETTERS ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME et al., Defendants and Respondents; DORIS ALLEN et al., Interveners and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

October 30, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Peter H. Flournoy for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Charles F. Getz IV, Assistant Attorney General, and Carol A. Squire, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Respondents.

Irell & Manella and Lawrence E. Goldenhersh for Interveners and Respondents.


OPINION

McDONALD, J.

In 1990 the California voters passed the Proposition 132 (Cal. Const. art. X B)1 initiative. Among other things, Proposition 132 banned the use of certain types of fishing gear along large portions of the California coastline. Appellants are fishermen adversely affected by this ban and seek to void Proposition 132.

I

Factual and Procedural History

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases