1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 533 N.W.2d
  5. 533 N.W.2d 641 (1995)
 

JINDRA v. CITY OF ST. ANTHONY

No. C7-94-2175.

533 N.W.2d 641 (1995)

Michael JINDRA, et al., Appellants, v. The CITY OF ST. ANTHONY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 27, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Racette, Harvey H. Eckart, Reinhardt and Anderson, St. Paul, for appellants.

Ellen A. Longfellow, Carla J. Heyl, St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by AMUNDSON, P.J., PETERSON and STONE, JJ.

OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

Appellants Michael and Carol Jindra challenge the district court order granting summary judgment in favor of respondent city of St. Anthony, arguing that the district court erred in granting summary judgment on three causes of action: negligence, nuisance, and a statutory claim based on the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA). We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

FACTS

The Jindras...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases