CROSSMAN v. MOORE

No. 327PA94.

459 S.E.2d 715 (1995)

341 N.C. 185

Dana M. CROSSMAN v. Van Dolan MOORE; and Van Dolan Moore, II, Individually.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 28, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wishart, Norris, Henninger & Pittman, P.A. by William H. Elam and June K. Allison, Burlington, for plaintiff-appellant.

Kennedy Covington Lobdell & Hickman, L.L.P. by F. Fincher Jarrell, Charlotte, for defendant-appellee.


WEBB, Justice.

We note first that the refusal of the court to order the relation back of the amendment making Van Dolan Moore, II a party in effect determines the case because defendant Van Dolan Moore, II may plead the statute of limitations. The order is appealable. N.C.G.S. § 1-277 (1983); Oestreicher v. Stores, 290 N.C. 118, 225 S.E.2d 797 (1976).

This case brings to the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases