Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
We reject the contention of defendant that Supreme Court erred in denying his motion to suppress items seized by the police and his statements to the police as the fruits of illegal searches of his hotel room, rental car and luggage. The record supports the court's conclusions that defendant voluntarily consented to the officers' entry into the hotel room (see, People v Murphy,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
