STATE v. WATKINS

No. C6-94-515.

526 N.W.2d 638 (1995)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. William D. WATKINS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 31, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., James P. Spencer, William F. Klumpp, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., St. Paul, Roger S. Van Heel, Stearns County Atty., St. Cloud, for respondent.

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Bruce L. McLellan, Sp. Asst. State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, P.J., and LANSING and AMUNDSON, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

At a Schwartz hearing following a criminal trial, jurors testified that a court bailiff in the jury room referred to one of the defense attorneys as "that darky" and that jurors referred to the African-American defendant as a "darky" or "that darky" during deliberations. These references gave rise to an unrebutted presumption of prejudice to the defendant's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights, and we reverse and remand for a new...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases