1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 901 P.2d
  5. 901 P.2d 258 (1995)
 

CONSTANT VELOCITY CORP. v. CITY OF AURORA

93C 11197; CA A83308.

901 P.2d 258 (1995)

136 Or. App. 81

CONSTANT VELOCITY CORPORATION, Appellant—Cross-Respondent, v. CITY OF AURORA, Sue Engels, Heather Wechter, Bill Carr, Mary Hellhake and Jean Grossnickle, Respondents—Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 9, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger J. Sharp, Vancouver, WA, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant—cross-respondent.

Thomas W. McPherson, Portland, argued the cause for respondents—cross-appellants. With him on the briefs was Mersereau & Shannon.

Before WARREN, P.J., and LANDAU and ARMSTRONG, JJ.

WARREN, Presiding Judge.

In this writ of review action, plaintiff appeals a circuit court judgment holding that the City of Aurora had erred in assessing plaintiff $14,307.70 for costs of abatement of a nuisance, and that the assessment should have been $4,163.50. The city cross-appeals,1 assigning error to the trial court's reduction in the assessment. We affirm on appeal and on cross-appeal.

The facts relevant to this appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases