1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 892 P.2d
  5. 892 P.2d 264 (1995)
 

CITY OF AURORA v. ACOSTA

No. 94SC250.

892 P.2d 264 (1995)

CITY OF AURORA, Petitioner, v. Max ACOSTA, Josephine Pullano, James Roper and Larry Hoffenberg, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

February 6, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Office of City Atty., Charles H. Richardson, Jr., Michael J. Hyman, Aurora, Becker Stowe Bowles & Lynch, P.C., Daniel C. Lynch, Denver, for petitioner.

Kilkenny Donelson & Gambin, A Partnership of Professional Corporations, Gregory J. Kilkenny, Stephen W. Donelson, Paul G. Gambin, Denver, for respondents.

Bruno, Bruno & Colin, P.C., Marc F. Colin, Richard A. Stubbs, Denver, for amicus curiae Aurora Police Ass'n.

David W. Broadwell, Denver, for amicus curiae Colo. Mun. League.

Justice MULLARKEY delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Respondents Acosta, Pullano, Roper and Hoffenberg, citizens and taxpayers of the City of Aurora, brought this action against the City of Aurora seeking invalidation of two voter-approved ballot issues, limitation of the district's spending base that was also approved by voters in a second ballot issue, declarative and injunctive relief regarding all future ballot questions, and an award of attorney's fees. Respondents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases