METROPOLITAN PROPERTY v. TRANSIT COM'N

No. C3-94-1606.

526 N.W.2d 628 (1995)

METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT COMMISSION, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted March 1, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katherine L. MacKinnon, Karen Melling van Vliet, Elizabeth Truesdell Smith Arthur, Chapman, McDonough, Kettering & Smetak, P.A., Minneapolis, for Respondent.

Frederick C. Brown, Bryan J. Leary, Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Kaufman, Ltd., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and SCHUMACHER and CRIPPEN, JJ.


OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment for Metropolitan Property and Casualty Corporation (Metropolitan). MTC argues that the district court erred: (1) by determining that Metropolitan's indemnification claim was timely since there is no statute of limitations on indemnification rights under the Minnesota no-fault act, and (2) by determining that even if the statute of limitations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases