HAMLIN v. SALEM AREA TRANSIT

93-02757; CA A83907.

905 P.2d 245 (1995)

137 Or. App. 497

In the Matter of the Compensation of George O. Hamlin, Claimant. George O. HAMLIN, Petitioner, v. SALEM AREA TRANSIT and SAIF CORPORATION, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 8, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Max Rae, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Steve R. Cotton, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


ARMSTRONG, Judge.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that increased claimant's permanent partial disability (PPD) award based on a finding that claimant has the capacity to perform work in the "medium/light" category. He contends that there is not substantial evidence in the record to support that finding. We review for substantial evidence, ORS 183.482(8)(c), and affirm.

Claimant has been employed as a city bus driver...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases