1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 541 N.W.2d
  5. 541 N.W.2d 600 (1995)
 

STOEBE v. MERASTAR INS. CO.

No. CX-95-1144.

541 N.W.2d 600 (1995)

Kay Louise STOEBE, Respondent, v. MERASTAR INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted March 19, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary C. Cade, Mark H. Gruesner, Schwebel, Goetz, Sieben & Moskal, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Michael B. Padden, Hurwitz & Padden, P.L.C., St. Paul, for appellant.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, P.J., and KALITOWSKI and SCHUMACHER, JJ.

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

On appeal from the denial of a new trial motion, Merastar Insurance Company challenges the district court's determination that Minn.R.Civ.P. 68 applied to an offer of judgment made two days before trial began. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

After being injured in an automobile accident, respondent Kay Stoebe began this lawsuit against appellant Merastar Insurance Company to collect uninsured motorist benefits. In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases