The Board found that although claimant was discharged because he was tardy on two occasions without calling his employer, claimant had previously been permitted to arrive to work late without calling and that he had not been warned that he was required to call in when he was late. The Board thus determined that claimant was not aware that his failure to call in his latenesses would lead to the termination of his employment and concluded that his actions did not constitute...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
