1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 213 A.D.2d
  5. 213 A.D.2d 921 (1995)
 

BORDEN v. McDONALD

213 A.D.2d 921 (1995)

623 N.Y.S.2d 959

Alfred Borden et al., Respondents, v. William McDonald, Jr., Appellant, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

March 23, 1995

Casey, J.

In keeping with the procedure prescribed for motions for summary judgment (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324), defendant William McDonald, Jr. (hereinafter defendant), as the movant, made a showing sufficient to entitle him to judgment as a matter of law. Defendant performed a cystoscopy on plaintiff Alfred Borden (hereinafter plaintiff) to remove a large calculus from plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases