1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 953 F.Supp.
  5. 953 F.Supp. 177 (1995)
 

DAYTON-HUDSON DEPT. STORE CO. v. AUTO-OWNERS INS. CO.

No. 5:94-CV-151.

953 F.Supp. 177 (1995)

DAYTON HUDSON DEPARTMENT STORE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

November 20, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter S. Shek, Saginaw, MI, for plaintiff.

John P. Seyfried, Garan, Lucow, Miller, Seward & Becker, P.C., Port Huron, MI, for defendant.

OPINION

BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge.

The parties, a no-fault carrier and an employee benefit plan, dispute their liability for medical benefits required by their mutually insured for injuries sustained in an auto accident. Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company ("Auto-Owners") moves to dismiss and for summary judgment on plaintiff's claim for reimbursement. For the following reasons, the Court will grant defendant's motion.

I.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases