GEORGE v. GEORGE


217 A.D.2d 913 (1995)

629 N.Y.S.2d 602

Mary George, Respondent, v. Lawrence George, Respondent. Alderman and Alderman, Nonparty Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

July 14, 1995


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the motion of Alderman and Alderman, the attorneys for defendant, to withdraw as defendant's attorneys. To be entitled to terminate the relationship with a client, an attorney must make a showing of good or sufficient cause and reasonable notice (see, Catrone v Catrone, 92 A.D.2d 559...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases