CHENEY RAILROAD COMPANY, INC., Petitioner,
v.
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.
TYSON RAILROAD, INC., Petitioner,
v.
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued December 9, 1994.
Decided March 24, 1995.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
William P. Jackson, Arlington, VA, argued the cause for petitioner Cheney R. Co., Inc. With him on the briefs was David C. Reeves, Arlington, VA.
Fritz R. Kahn, Washington, DC, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner Tyson R.R., Inc.
Catherine C. Cook, Gen. Counsel, R.R. Retirement Bd., Chicago, IL, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Stephen A. Bartholow, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Thomas W. Sadler, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marguerite P. Dadabo, Gen. Atty., and Kelli D. Simmons Gen. Atty., R.R. Retirement Bd., Chicago, IL.
Before: WILLIAMS, HENDERSON, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
The issue in these appeals is whether feeder railroads that are exempt from most of the requirements of the Interstate Commerce Act remain subject to the Railroad Retirement Act ("RRA") and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act ("RUIA"). Two feeder railroads, petitioners Cheney Railroad Company, Inc. and Tyson Railroad, Inc., challenge the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
