Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges a policy instituted by respondents in connection with an inmate "call home" program. Under this policy, inmates are limited to a total of 15 persons with whom they may communicate by telephone, whose names must be on an approved list. Contrary to petitioner's assertions, this policy does not violate his constitutional right to free speech or contravene respondents' own regulations.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.