1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 220 A.D.2d
  5. 220 A.D.2d 899 (1995)
 

PEOPLE v. EAREL

220 A.D.2d 899 (1995)

632 N.Y.S.2d 689

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harley H. Earel, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

October 19, 1995

Casey, J.

Defendant first contends that the bill of particulars provided by the prosecution was insufficient. A bill of particulars is not a discovery device; it serves to clarify the pleading (People v Davis, 41 N.Y.2d 678, 680). Defendant requested a bill of particulars stating the date, time and place of the alleged rape and the conduct which constituted forcible compulsion within the meaning of Penal Law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases