1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 530 N.W.2d
  5. 530 N.W.2d 588 (1995)
 

WIDMARK v. NORTHRUP KING CO.

No. C0-95-52.

530 N.W.2d 588 (1995)

Alan WIDMARK, Appellant, v. NORTHRUP KING CO., Dave Goddard, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied June 14, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald R. Frauenshuh, Jr., Ortonville, for appellant.

Craig D. Diviney, Nancy Willis Burger-Smith, Dorsey & Whitney, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, for respondents.

Considered and decided by AMUNDSON, P.J., PETERSON and HARTEN, JJ.

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges summary judgment in favor of respondent on appellant's claims of usury, misappropriation of a customer list, and misrepresentation. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Alan Widmark is a farmer in Lincoln County. In 1986, Widmark began working as a dealer for StaufferSeeds, a seed company, selling seeds to local farmers. In 1987, respondent Northrup King Co. (Northrup) acquired StaufferSeeds and assumed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases