1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 65 F.3d
  5. 65 F.3d 1051 (1995)
 

KING v. ALLIED VISION, LTD.

Nos. 1996, 1997, Dockets 94-7409, 94-7225.

65 F.3d 1051 (1995)

Stephen KING, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALLIED VISION, LTD.; and Innovation Books, a division of the Innovation Corporation, Defendants, New Line Cinema Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided September 15, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melvyn R. Leventhal, Leventhal Slade & Krantz, New York City (Marianne Yen, Leventhal Slade & Krantz, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Paul R. Levenson, Cowan Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., New York City (Robert W. Clarida, Cowan Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., Peter Herbert, Philippe Zimmerman, Moses & Singer, New York City on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: ALTIMARI, MAHONEY, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.

ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-appellant New Line Cinema Corporation ("New Line") appeals from two judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Motley, J.), each holding it in civil contempt for failing to comply with a consent decree between New Line and plaintiff-appellee Stephen King ("King"). Under the decree, New Line agreed not to use King's name in connection with the marketing of the film "The Lawnmower Man...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases