CITY OF LITCHFIELD v. SCHWANKE

No. C6-94-2099.

530 N.W.2d 580 (1995)

CITY OF LITCHFIELD, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Dale R. SCHWANKE, Respondent, Steven J. Mattson, et al., Lower Court Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 25, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven E. Drange, Litchfield City Atty., David G. Berry, Asst. Litchfield City Atty., Olson, Nelson, Drange & Wood, Litchfield, for appellant.

Bradley A. Kluver, Schaps & Kluver, Litchfield, for respondent.

Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., PARKER and FOLEY, JJ.


OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.

The City of Litchfield sought expenses incurred in carrying out an order against respondents under the Minnesota Hazardous and Substandard Buildings Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 463.15-.261 (1992). The trial court denied the city's request, and the city appeals. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Steven and Mary Mattson purchased the property at issue in 1988, and sold it on a contract for deed to respondent Dale...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases