1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 36 Cal.App.4th
  5. 36 Cal.App.4th 1074 (1995)
 

STACY & WITBECK v. CTY & CTY SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. A066609.

36 Cal.App.4th 1074 (1995)

STACY & WITBECK, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

July 17, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Louise Renne, City Attorney, George K. Wong and Geoffrey Spellberg, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendant and Appellant.

Rutan & Tucker, Hans Van Ligten and Matthew McQueen as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Knecht, Haley, Lawrence & Smith and Richard A. Bunn for Plaintiff and Respondent and as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

ANDERSON, P.J.

The crux of this appeal is whether a municipality, consistent with applicable ordinances and without overreaching areas occupied by state law, can bar a contractor from bidding on its public works projects for five years, on a declaration of irresponsibility for knowingly filing a false claim. We conclude it can and reverse the order preliminarily enjoining the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases