STAMATIO v. HURCO COMPANIES, INC.

No. IP 94-308 C.

892 F.Supp. 214 (1995)

Constantine STAMATIO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HURCO COMPANIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

July 18, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter G. Tamulonis, John B. Drummy, Kightlinger & Gray, Indianapolis, IN, Kenneth A. Jacobsen, Francis J. Farina, Chimicles Jacobsen & Tikellis, Haverford, PA, for plaintiffs.

Christopher G. Scanlon, Kevin M. Toner, Scott D. Himsel, Baker & Daniels, Indianapolis, IN, James A. McDermott, Anne N. DePrez, Anne C. McGown, Barnes & Thornburg, Indianapolis, IN, for defendants.


ENTRY ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER

BARKER, Chief Judge.

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In its previous entry,1 the Court found that Plaintiff failed to adequately allege scienter on the part of Defendants and dismissed Counts I and II with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(6). Constantine Stamatio ("Stamatio" or "Plaintiff") now moves this Court to reconsider its judgment of April 12, 1995, or in the alternative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases