EDWARDS v. CITY OF HOUSTON

Nos. 93-2315, 93-2476.

49 F.3d 1048 (1995)

Dorothy A. EDWARDS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, Defendant-Appellee, v. Terry HUGHES, Individually and as a Representative of the Houston Airport Police Officers Association and its Officers and Sergeants of the former Airport Police Force and Houston Police Patrolmen's Union, Intervenors-Plaintiffs Movant-Appellants, and McLoy Medlock, Richard Humphrey, Willie Fields and Bennie L. Green, Movant-Appellants. Dorothy A. EDWARDS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, Defendant-Intervenor Appellee, v. HOUSTON POLICE PATROLMEN'S UNION, Etc., and the individual peace officers identified in appendix A., an affiliate of the International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO, Local 109, Intervenor-Plaintiff Movant-Appellant, and McLoy Medlock, Richard Humphrey, Willie Fields and Bennie L. Green, Consolidated-Plaintiffs Movant-Appellants, and Doug ELDER and Mark Clark, Individually and as representative of the general membership of the Houston Police Officers Association and all Class A. Police Officers holding the Rank of Police Officer and Sergeant of Police, Movants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 15, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clinard J. Hanby, Essmyer & Hanby, Houston, TX, for Hughes.

Joan M. Lucci Bain, Houston, TX, for Houston Police.

Jacqueline E. Medlock, Houston, TX, for Medlock, Humphrey, Field and Green.

O.F. Jones, III, Victoria, TX, for amicus curiae.

John E. Fisher, Benjamin L. Hall, III, City Attys., Houston, TX, for City of Houston.

Richard T. Seymour and Sharon R. Vinick, Lawyers' Committee for Civ. Rights Under Law, Washington, DC, for Dorothy Edwards, et al.

Fred A. Keyes, Jr., Gen. Council, Houston Police Officers Ass'n., Houston, TX, for Elder and Clark and Houston Police Officers Ass'n.

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.


BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases