1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 35 Cal.App.4th
  5. 35 Cal.App.4th 1061 (1995)
 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. CARTAGENA

Docket No. A065055.

35 Cal.App.4th 1061 (1995)

41 Cal. Rptr.2d 797

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JOSE CARTAGENA, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

June 14, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Roderick E. Walston, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary A. Roth, and Carol Ann White, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Christopher C. Welch for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

PETERSON, P.J.

This case considers the simple question of whether a paternity blood test may be judicially compelled at the behest of a father who is seeking to vacate a three-year-old paternity judgment. Appellant City and County of San Francisco (City) contends that the court abused its discretion in ordering paternity blood testing at the behest of respondent Jose Cartagena, the judicially determined father, prior to a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases