1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 31 Cal.App.4th
  5. 31 Cal.App.4th 1060 (1995)
 

DEL ORO HILLS v. CITY OF OCEANSIDE

Docket No. D017139.

31 Cal.App.4th 1060 (1995)

37 Cal. Rptr.2d 677

DEL ORO HILLS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF OCEANSIDE, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

January 23, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Worley, Schwartz, Garfield & Rice and Donald R. Worley for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Myers, Widder & Gibson, Freilich, Stone, Leitner & Carlisle, Katherine E. Stone, J. Roger Myers, Brown, Diven & Hentschke, Brown, Harper, Burns & Hentschke and Daniel S. Hentschke for Defendant and Respondent.

Christi Hogan, City Attorney (Malibu), as Amicus Curiae.

OPINION

HUFFMAN, Acting P.J.

The initial questions posed by this appeal as to the validity of a residential growth control initiative, chapter 32A of the City of Oceanside Municipal Code, commonly known as Proposition A (Prop. A), adopted by the voters of the respondent City of Oceanside (the City), were answered by this court in our opinion filed July 19, 1994, in Building Industry Assn. (also referred to as BIA) v. City...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases