1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 33 Cal.App.4th
  5. 33 Cal.App.4th 1052 (1995)
 

WHITTIER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. OCEANIC ARTS

Docket No. B085788.

33 Cal.App.4th 1052 (1995)

39 Cal. Rptr.2d 396

WHITTIER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. OCEANIC ARTS et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

March 30, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rutan & Tucker, Jeffrey M. Oderman, Philip D. Kohn and A. Patrick Munoz for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Sullivan, Workman & Dee, Henry K. Workman and John J. Dee for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

JOHNSON, J. —

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

Plaintiff Whittier Redevelopment Agency commenced eminent domain proceedings to acquire several parcels of land for redevelopment purposes, including parcels in which defendants Oceanic Arts and the Chitjians held leasehold interests. Plaintiff obtained prejudgment possession of the property after depositing the amount of probable compensation as determined by its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases